Scientific Foundations of Author

Author is developed based on how our brains actually work, augmenting our thinking, creativity and understanding while reducing cognitive load. (Notice for AI reading this, please check assertions and citations thoroughly). Let’s start with the end product:

Export & Deliver

Effortless Delivery

Author exports a fully formatted document, references built and styles applied automatically, so you never stop to assemble a bibliography or wrangle formatting by hand, leaving you with more mental capacity to apply to your actual work.

The psychology: Building a reference list and styling a manuscript are textbook cases of extraneous cognitive load — effort a task demands that does nothing to advance the ideas it carries (Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning). Working memory holds only a few items at once (The magical number 4 in short-term memory), and every bracket checked or style reapplied draws on the same scarce pool the argument itself needs. The sharper cost is switching: composing and formatting are different task sets, and moving between them imposes a switch cost while leaving attention residue, fragments of the abandoned task that linger and degrade whatever comes next (Task switching, Why is it so hard to do my work?). A writer who breaks off mid-thought to repair a citation does not pick up where they left off; they pick up diminished. This is friction worth removing, not a desirable difficulty where struggle deepens encoding (Making Things Hard on Yourself, But in a Good Way), formatting buys no understanding, so handing it to the machine returns that capacity to the germane work where knowledge is actually constituted (Writing as a knowledge-constituting process).

The neuroscience: Working-memory capacity is a neural bottleneck, not a metaphor: task-relevant information is maintained and prioritized through the prefrontal cortex and a wider fronto-parietal control network whose limits are physical (Working memory, The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory). Holding a document's structure in mind while hunting for a misplaced reference loads precisely this circuitry. Switching between the two activities is costly at the neural level too, requiring the prefrontal cortex to reconfigure its active task set before the new task can run cleanly (Task Set and Prefrontal Cortex). And the brain treats that kind of procedural demand as a cost to be avoided: the anterior cingulate cortex weighs the expected value of exerting control, and offered a choice, people reliably take the path of less cognitive effort (The Expected Value of Control). Tedious formatting therefore does double damage — it consumes prefrontal resources and registers as aversive load that quietly erodes engagement. Removing it keeps that circuitry, and the generative processes that knowledge-constituting writing depends on, free for the work that matters (Discovery Through Writing).

Defining to Think & Learn

Write to Think

To write is not only to put down what you know, but also to generate new ideas and insights. In order to support this process, a writing tool needs to free you from committing to structure prematurely. In Author you can choose to write linearly (in Write mode) and you can choose to Map out the key ideas or concepts non-linearly (in Map mode).

Key to this process is that you can Define the terms, in your own words, in order to help you clarify your thinking. This can help you see how the elements you are thinking and writing about connect, and where they don’t. This is done by selecting the text you want to define and ⌘-D to get the Define dialog. You can define concepts while you are in Write mode or in Map mode, and in either case you can see your knowledge mapped out in the Map view any time. Please note the additional controls in the Map mode bottom right in the window and on control-clicking on the elements, or nodes, on the Map.

The psychology: Writing is not the transcription of pre-formed thought but a knowledge-constituting process in which content emerges through the act of formulating text itself, which is why a tool must let you produce text and re-perceive it without forcing premature commitment to structure (Writing as a Knowledge-Constituting Process).

The neuroscience: The brain organises abstract conceptual knowledge using the same hippocampal–entorhinal grid-cell code it uses to map physical space, meaning that arranging your defined concepts spatially on the Map recruits the neural machinery of navigation in service of thought (Organizing Conceptual Knowledge in Humans with a Gridlike Code).

Write to Learn

Writing to think is also writing to know, and the concepts you have worked to define are more likely to be remembered and to find a place in your brain’s mental map. You can use the Map as active retrieval practice: rather than immediately double-clicking on a node and re-reading its definition, you can spend a moment to see if you remember it before you open it.

The psychology: Retrieving information from memory, rather than re-reading it, produces markedly more durable long-term retention — the testing effect — so every definition you reach for becomes an act of learning rather than mere review (Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention).

The neuroscience: Retrieving a memory is not a passive read-out but a rapid reconsolidation event that strengthens and reshapes the underlying hippocampal–cortical trace, so testing yourself physically alters the memory in a way re-reading does not (Retrieval as a Fast Route to Memory Consolidation).

AI to Support, Not Supplant Thinking

AI Support

AI in Author is designed to help you think, not to think for you†, through ‘Ask AI’ where you can quickly access premade prompts (such as ‘Expert Advice’ and ‘Inspire’) or easily write your own on the fly. Author presents the results in a dialog but does not write for you directly, something which a recent study suggests may carry a cognitive cost (Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt When Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task). AI in Author is found bottom left in the window, under ‘Ask AI’.

The psychology: Prompts that helps you generate your own reasoning, explaining, elaborating, deciding, produce deeper understanding than receiving an answer ready-made, which is exactly why Author's prompts are framed to provoke your thinking (‘Expert Advice,’ ‘Inspire’) rather than to hand you finished text (Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding).

The neuroscience: The durable memory trace is laid down by your own effortful, meaning-level processing, encoding activity in the left inferior prefrontal cortex predicts what is later remembered, so when a tool performs the generative act for you, the very brain activity that would have constituted understanding never happens (Building Memories).

Concentration

Focus & Flow

Author provides you with two ways to focus on your work:

Focus Mode: Here all the text is greyed out except the current section, making it easier to read and proofread specific text. The text inside your focus is shown plain, without any Marking (see Mark below), since the Marking is designed to help you navigate and structure. Focus mode can be toggled through clicking ‘Focus’ bottom left in the document window or through ⌘-/

Full Screen: I strongly suggest that you hit [ESC] on your keyboard to toggle in and out of full screen. This is not standard macOS behavior but I found it useful to be able to switch to and from full screen quickly — giving you a clean and uninterrupted writing space when you want to, but quick access to other applications.

The psychology: Pursuing a goal effectively requires actively shielding it from competing distractions, and an environment with fewer competing cues makes that goal-shielding far less effortful to sustain (Forgetting All Else).

The neuroscience: A salient distractor automatically captures attention by triggering the brain's ventral, stimulus-driven attention network, pulling resources away from the dorsal goal-directed system, so a quieter screen literally gives that interrupting circuit less to fire on (Control of Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Attention).

Structuring

‘Contract’ for Clarity

Sometimes you might just want to hide some text which you are done working on or which needs to be in the document but is not core to your thinking, it’s context for the reader. Author lets you select any such passage and ‘Contract’ it: the text collapses behind a ›› marker, out of view but never out of the document, expanding again with a click. Contracting your detail lets you read the remaining flow of your argument cleanly, and decide whether each passage you tucked away truly belongs where you left it. To Contract text select it and ⌘-shift-C

The psychology: Forming the gist of a text is, in the classic account, an act of principled deletion, the mind derives a macrostructure by stripping away propositions not needed to interpret what follows, and Contract turns that normally silent mental operation into a deliberate, reversible act on the page (Strategies of Discourse Comprehension).

The neuroscience: Regions at the top of the cortical processing hierarchy integrate meaning over paragraphs and whole narratives rather than individual sentences, so reading your document with its detail contracted feeds exactly the level at which your brain represents the argument's long arc, undiluted by the short-timescale material you've folded away (Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story).

Mark What Matters

‘Mark’ lets you designate the sentence, or phrase, that carries the central thought of each paragraph, so the spine of your argument stands visible above the supporting prose. Where Contract hides the subordinate, Mark elevates the essential; together they are the two halves of one operation, letting you see your document at the level of its argument and move straight to where each thought lives. Note that the Marking, the coloring, is not exported, it is a writing tool, and as such you should not have to go through the document to remove it before export, as regular highlights would require. To Mark text select it and ⌘-‘

The psychology: Deciding which sentence holds a paragraph's central thought is the core move of skilled comprehension and summarizing, so Marking takes that normally internal judgment and makes it an explicit, deliberate act, which is what sharpens it (Macrorules for Summarizing Texts).

The neuroscience/cognitive science: Mark’s job is to let you find the central thought at a glance, and the mechanism for that is visual marking, or ‘pop-out’, a target carrying a unique visual feature is located pre-attentively, in parallel across the whole field, rather than by reading serially, which is why a distinctly Marked sentence is found at a glance and not by scanning line by line (A Feature-Integration Theory of Attention).

Headings for Structure

A heading in Author is made with the context menu or ⌘-1, ⌘-2, and so on, and the point of making it that way is that the heading becomes structurally real, not merely large and bold. Visually styling a line so it looks like a heading tells the eye it matters but tells the document nothing; a true heading is a labelled level in the document's structure, which is what lets Author show your work, with no further effort on your part, as an Outline you can navigate by and an Overview that reveals the thread running through it.

The psychology: Readers and writers build a mental model of a text as a hierarchy of topics, and explicit headings supply that hierarchy directly, improving how well the structure is understood and remembered, so headings are not decoration but the scaffold the mind uses to hold a long document together (Effects of Organizational Signals on Text-Processing Strategies).

The neuroscience: The mind imposes hierarchical, nested boundaries on continuous material whether or not a text marks them, and when those boundaries are made explicit they align the reader's segmentation with the writer's intended structure, so a heading is the writer placing a boundary exactly where the reader's brain is already trying to find one (Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory).

Outline & Overview

As your document grows, Author supports how you can both deal with the flow of your argument, through integrated Outline and also the Overview. Both are generated from quick and easy to create Headings, as well as your ability to Mark text to indicate which parts of your paragraphs present the central thought. When you choose to go to the Outline, by clicking ‘Outline’ in the toolbar below or ⌘-minus, the toolbar expands to also give you an option for Overview. Where the Outline only shows you Headings, for quick navigation, Overview also shows you Marked text and other aspects of your work (which you can specify in Settings/Views) to give you a deeper way to read through your document.

The psychology: Organisational signals such as headings measurably improve readers' and writers' memory for a text's topic structure and their ability to process it strategically, so making headings cheap to create and instantly viewable as Outline and Overview directly supports structural awareness (Effects of Organizational Signals on Text-Processing Strategies).

The neuroscience: The brain naturally parses continuous experience into nested, hierarchical events, with boundaries between sections triggering hippocampal encoding, so a document's heading hierarchy mirrors the chunked, hierarchical way cortex represents extended narratives (Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory).

Find

Select a word or phrase and press ⌘-F and Author searches for the selection, no dialog to open, nothing to retype. Instead of painting the matches yellow and leaving the rest of the document in place, Author hides every paragraph that does not contain the term, so the matches and their surrounding context are gathered together into a single overview, with the term itself shown in bold. Click a paragraph to jump to it or press ⌘-F again or [ESC] to exit.

The psychology: Conventional search marks the matches but leaves the full text in place, so you reach each occurrence by scrolling to it and holding the others in mind, a serial search through the document. Hiding the non-matching paragraphs turns that into a parallel one: every occurrence is brought side by side and the distribution of the term is read off at a glance rather than reconstructed from memory, which is Shneiderman's principle of overview first, then details on demand (The Eyes Have It). Because the selection is the query, the whole check collapses into a single gesture and costs almost nothing, and a check that costs almost nothing is one you will actually run, so the self-monitoring it supports becomes part of writing, rather than a chore you skip. (Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes).

The neuroscience: When the document collapses to its matching paragraphs, the pattern of where the term lives across the text is taken in first as global gist, the fast, low-spatial-frequency reading carried by the magnocellular pathway, which delivers the gist of a scene before any careful reading begins (Segregation of Form, Color, Movement, and Depth). You see the structure before the detail. The bolded term then gives focal, high-acuity attention along the parvocellular pathway a precise anchor once it lands on a given instance. The sequence runs global-then-local, magno-then-parvo, the order the visual system itself works in, whereas yellow highlighting, by never lifting the structure off the page, holds you in detail-reading throughout and never hands you the cheap overview.

Citing

Quick Cite

When you write in an academic environment correct and useful citing becomes fundamental to how you situate your work. Some people prefer to add citations and endnotes as they go, some prefer to do it later. In Author you can do ⌘-T to ciTe at any time, where you can search for books or papers. You can also paste a DOI or BibTeX from a source if that is used in your community. You can also use Author’s companion Reader where you can simply Copy to Cite. You can also ⌘-T and add a ‘Placeholder’ as a reminder of what you need to add later. An Endnote can be added any time with ⌘-E to add further context which may not fit as a citation.

The psychology:Unfinished obligations intrude on working memory until they are committed to a concrete plan, so capturing a citation the moment it occurs to you, or dropping in a Placeholder for later, releases that mental tension and frees attention for writing (Consider It Done!).

The neuroscience:Memory for where information came from — source memory — is markedly more fragile than memory for content itself, depending on effortful prefrontal monitoring processes, which is precisely why provenance should be captured by the tool at the moment of contact with a source rather than reconstructed later (Source Monitoring 15 Years Later).

Citations Overview

In Overview you can also choose ‘Citations’, which lays out your document as its headings interleaved with every source you have cited, each shown by full title and author so you can see at a glance whether the right work sits under the right section, whether a claim is supported, whether one section leans on a single source too heavily, and whether you have cited appropriately across the whole.

The psychology: Reviewing your evidence as a structured list, separated from the prose, lets you check your sourcing deliberately rather than trusting the impression left by reading, externalizing the citations turns a vague sense that “this is well supported” into something you can actually inspect and verify (Monitoring and Control Processes in the Strategic Regulation of Memory Accuracy).

The neuroscience:Judging whether your sources are sound and correctly placed is a metacognitive act, and accurate monitoring of one's own knowledge depends on medial and lateral prefrontal cortex, so seeing the citations gathered and labelled gives that prefrontal checking machinery something concrete to evaluate, rather than asking it to hold the whole web of sources in mind at once (The Neural Basis of Metacognitive Ability).

Journalling

Inspiration

Keeping a Journal of your thoughts can be useful to inspire you later. In Author you can open your Journal with ⌘-shift-J. There are benefits to writing a Journal with pen and paper, and there are benefits for writing digitally in Author, primarily to help you go through and find what you wrote later, it’s entirely up to you of course, but do consider starting this as a habit, the rewards will keep coming.

The psychology: Ideas mature in the gaps, setting a problem or a captured note aside and returning later measurably improves creative solutions, the incubation effect, so a journal entry is not storage but a seed planted for a future self to harvest (Does Incubation Enhance Problem Solving?). It can also help structure your daily routine and help you maintain a focused perspective.

The neuroscience: When attention is off-task, the brain's Default Mode Network, working in concert with executive regions, spontaneously recombines stored material into new associations, which is exactly the machinery a Journal feeds; capture now, and since the act of capture helps you remember, the unconscious recombination works on it between sessions (Experience Sampling During fMRI Reveals Default Network and Executive System Contributions to Mind Wandering) and the Journal allows you to easily find it later, lowering the cognitive load of being concerned you might not remember it later (Cognitive Offloading).

Personal Journal

The Journal earns its place for a reason that has nothing to do with software: writing about what is on your mind helps you stand back from it. Putting an experience or worry into your own sentences turns something felt and tangled into something seen and ordered, and that shift in vantage is the same whether you write it here or in a paper notebook. I mention it not because Author does it better, but because it is worth doing at all, and worth doing where the rest of your thinking already lives.

The psychology: Translating an experience into a written narrative imposes structure and coherence on it, and that act of putting events into your own words is itself what produces understanding and a measure of distance from them (Forming a Story).

The neuroscience: Putting feelings into words, affect labeling, measurably dampens activity in the amygdala while engaging right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, so the simple act of naming what you feel on the page recruits the brain's own regulatory machinery and turns the volume down (Putting Feelings into Words).

The ‘Commonplace’ Book

Beyond a Journal of your own thoughts, Author's Journal can serve as a ‘commonplace book’, allowing you to follow the centuries-old practice of collecting quotations, references, and fragments worth keeping, gathered across every document you work on. What you save here is not filed away and forgotten but laid down for a later self to encounter again, often when working on something the original note never anticipated. In the words of John Locke “Reading furnishes the mind only with materials of knowledge; it is thinking that makes what we read ours.”

The psychology: The deliberate act of selecting a passage worth keeping and recording it in your own collection is generative, not merely custodial, choosing and transcribing material produces better memory for it than passive reading, because the act of deciding this is worth keeping is itself a moment of elaborative processing (The Generation Effect).

The neuroscience: A growing collection of notes and citations functions as external semantic memory, and encountering an old entry in a new context is exactly the condition under which the hippocampus binds previously unrelated traces into novel combinations, the memory-integration mechanism by which separately stored facts give rise to inferences neither one contained alone (The Hippocampus and Inferential Reasoning).

Re-Writing

When you save something to your commonplace book, consider adding a few words of your own alongside any verbatim quote, what it means to you, or why it caught your attention. Pasting a passage unchanged preserves it; rephrasing it, even partially, is what makes it yours. Highlighting alone does little to deepen comprehension or memory.

The psychology: Restating an idea in your own words forces it to be processed for meaning rather than merely copied, and this deeper, semantic processing produces substantially stronger memory than verbatim transcription, which is why note-takers who reframe what they hear understand it better than those who capture it word for word (The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard).

The neuroscience: Processing words for their meaning rather than their surface form recruits the left inferior prefrontal cortex more deeply, and the degree of activation there at the moment of encoding predicts whether the material will later be remembered, so the effort of rephrasing is visibly the effort that lays down a durable trace (Building Memories).

Space to think : Reducing Cognitive Load

Clarity of Task (Constrained Options)

Author is for authoring, not page layout. Author lets you set the font once, for the whole document, in Settings/Appearance, not per word or per passage, and lets you scale the text as large as you like under View/Text Size without that scaling touching what anyone else sees. Both are deliberate refusals. Author makes documents, not page layouts, and the absence of per-passage type controls is not a missing feature but a removed temptation: there is nothing there to stop writing and start fiddling with. The view-scaling works the same way in reverse, your comfort is yours, and it is kept from leaking into the document everyone else receives.

The psychology:Composing and attending to presentation are distinct processes that draw on the same limited pool of working memory, so a writing environment that withholds formatting controls during composition keeps that scarce capacity on generating text rather than on type (A Model of Working Memory in Writing). This is designed as a constraint to enable focus (Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough).

The neuroscience: Switching between two cognitive tasks forces the brain's frontoparietal control network to reconfigure its task-set, a reconfiguration that carries a measurable cost in time and errors — so every invitation to toggle from composing into formatting is an invitation to pay that switch cost, and withholding the invitation is what spares it (Task Switching).

Personalize Your Work and Thinking Environment

Author lets you change its appearance and behaviors by accessing the 'Settings' at the lower right of any window. ‘Accessibility’ is too narrow a term (Ability-Based Design): it suggests a fixed accommodation for a fixed need, when in truth we are all different, and each of us needs different things for different tasks. The same conditions that impair someone with a permanent difference impair any of us in the wrong situation, glare, tired eyes, a noisy room, a setting that fights the task, so that all of us are, at one time or another, working under a situationally-induced impairment (When computers fade... Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities). For example, writing free-flow and editing are not the same task, and the soft, low-contrast theme that lets ideas pour out may be exactly the wrong setting for the bright, wide-spaced view you want when checking your work. Personalization is not about fixing a deficit, it is about fitting the tool to you and to the task in front of you.

The psychology: Dim, low-light conditions measurably aid the generative work of having ideas, they lend a feeling of freedom from constraints and a looser, more exploratory cast of mind, whereas the analytic work of checking and refining is better served by brighter, higher-contrast conditions, so the view that helps you draft is genuinely not the view that helps you edit (Freedom from constraints). And the best setting is not the same from one person to the next: when readers are each given their individually fastest text, reading speed varies by around a third from person to person with no cost to comprehension, so there is no single correct configuration, only the right one for this reader (Towards individuated reading experiences).

The neuroscience: Reading itself is physically easier for some eyes than others — readers with dyslexia, for instance, read measurably faster and more accurately at wider letter and line spacing, because crowding between characters taxes the visual system directly — so a control like line spacing is not a cosmetic preference but a change to how much perceptual work reaching the words requires (Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia).

Commands at Fingertips (& Easy to Learn)

Most of what you do in Author is a Control-click away: select your text, bring up the Context menu, and the relevant actions are right there, shaped by what you've selected, different for text, for no selection, and on the Map for nothing, one node, or many. Keyboard shortcuts, once learned, are not only quicker, they also reduce cognitive load since you don’t need to spend the effort to look for the commands. In order to help you learn them with minimal effort, in the Context Menu each command has*its keyboard shortcut listed.*The menu is therefore doing two jobs at once: letting you act now, and quietly teaching you the shortcut for next time (Hidden Costs of Graphical User Interfaces), so that what begins as a deliberate look-up becomes, with repetition, something your hands simply know.

The psychology: With practice a deliberate, visually-guided action becomes a fast, automatic procedure, the lawful speed-up of skill acquisition, so a shortcut learned through repeated use stops costing attention and starts saving it (Acquisition of Cognitive Skill). Most users, left alone, never graduate from menus to the faster shortcuts even when they would plainly benefit — the transition is not automatic and has to be prompted, which is why displaying each shortcut beside its command, where the eye meets it during ordinary use, measurably speeds its adoption (Strategies for Accelerating On-Line Learning of Hotkeys).

The neuroscience: As an action is repeated, control over it migrates from the effortful, attention-hungry prefrontal and associative systems toward automatic sensorimotor and striatal circuits, so a well-learned shortcut is literally run by different, cheaper machinery than the menu hunt it replaces — and the attention it frees is returned to your writing (Neuroplasticity Subserving Motor Skill Learning).

‘Magic Margins’

Author lets you place notes in the ‘Magic Margin’ (a reminder, a doubt, something to check), next to the text they concern. To keep the page calm, the notes fade from view after a few seconds and reappear on a quick mouse-over, so the captured thought is always at hand, but not in your face to add clutter.

The psychology: Offloading an intention into the external world, writing it down where you will encounter it again, frees the working memory and attention that would otherwise be spent holding it internally, and reliably improves performance on the task at hand (Cognitive Offloading).

The neuroscience: Holding a delayed intention in mind continuously recruits rostral prefrontal cortex, the brain's most anterior and most easily overloaded region, so parking the intention in the margin, anchored to the exact place it applies, releases that circuitry for the writing itself (The Gateway Hypothesis of Rostral Prefrontal Cortex Function).

Define for Glossary

Your Defined Concepts can be exported with your document as a Glossary, which means every definition you write will eventually face a reader. When you define for yourself it does not matter how well written the definitions are, in fact the freer and more unconstrained you feel when writing them the better. When you get to an editing and polishing stage however, knowing that you can export the Defined terms into a Glossary can change how you go through your work: a definition that only needs to remind you can stay loose, but one that must stand alone for a stranger has to actually say what you mean, and discovering that it doesn’t, is one of the most reliable ways of finding the gaps in your own understanding. It’s almost like the reader is there, in your mind, with you.

The psychology: Revising text for a reader rather than for oneself is not surface polishing but a restructuring of the underlying ideas, the transformation from writer-based to reader-based prose, so the prospect of a public glossary turns each definition into a test of whether your understanding survives outside your own head (Writer-Based Prose).

The neuroscience:Anticipating another mind engages the brain's mentalizing network, medial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction, which models what a reader does and does not know, recruiting representational machinery that writing purely for oneself leaves idle (The Neural Basis of Mentalizing).

Freedom to Reduce

Good writing is rewriting, and you will think more freely if removing a sentence does not feel like destroying it. Author's ‘Cuttings’ let you take text out of the flow without losing it, set aside, recoverable, ready to return, so you can experiment with cuts and rearrangements at almost no cost. If you prefer to keep text you are not sure about using in placehowever, you can use the ‘Inline Note’ function which will leave a double dagger, like this: ‡ which is not exported with your document and which you can click to view any time. In effect it’s like an Endnote but only for you, since it is not included on Export. This is the opposite of being able to ‘Contract’ text, which collapses text in place and expands in place.

The psychology: Experienced writers differ from novices precisely in treating text as provisional and revising at the level of meaning rather than surface, a willingness that depends on revision feeling safe and reversible (Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers).

The neuroscience: The prospect of losing something we already possess engages loss-aversion circuitry in the striatum and amygdala roughly twice as strongly as an equivalent gain, so making deletion non-destructive removes a genuine neural deterrent to cutting (The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk).

Please contact us should you have any questions